A Question of Resilience and Equality in Hong Kong’s Weather Response
Hong Kong is known for its bustling city life, where the rhythm of work and daily routines rarely falters. However, recent events have raised questions about the city's approach to handling extreme weather conditions. With transport services largely available and several stores open during storms, it's unclear why most white-collar workers need to stay home. This situation has sparked a debate about whether the current system of managing weather-related disruptions is still relevant.
Hong Kong has a three-tier rainstorm warning system—amber, red, and black—that is designed to alert the community about the intensity of rainfall. While this system serves its purpose, there is growing concern about whether it is still suitable as a guide for whether people should go to work or be expected to do so. The recent experience of multiple black rainstorm signals within a short period highlights the need for a more nuanced approach.
During one particularly rainy week, the author had to travel from Hong Kong Island to the RTHK studio in Broadcast Drive for a radio show. Despite the red and black rainstorm alerts, the journey was smooth, with traffic being light and train services operating normally. Even when cloudbursts occurred, taxis and public transport were readily available. These experiences suggest that the city could adopt a more pragmatic approach to managing weather disruptions.
On both days, the author encountered a number of common features that raise broader questions. Trains, buses, minibuses, and taxis seemed to run smoothly, and emergency services were evidently available. Doctors and nurses continued their duties, while maintenance workers cleared drainage channels and blocked roads. Convenience stores, food outlets, and even some fitness studios remained open. These observations indicate that much of daily life can continue without major interruptions.
However, one notable absence was that of office workers. If it was safe enough for bus drivers to show up for work, why were the people who usually occupy the seats on those buses not present? This discrepancy raises questions about the fairness of the current system. If convenience stores can remain open during severe weather, why not government offices or banks?
The issue also touches on deeper societal concerns. There seems to be an unspoken division based on class that makes it acceptable for some people to face the elements while others are kept dry at all costs. It is important to consider whether such disparities are justified or if they reflect a broader inequality in how different groups are treated during extreme weather events.
With the advancements in artificial intelligence, there is an opportunity for Hong Kong to improve its ability to differentiate between geographic areas affected by severe weather. For instance, it might be safe to travel to certain neighborhoods while others remain inaccessible. Similar considerations apply to the city’s typhoon signal system, which may not always be appropriate for all sectors of the population.
As climate change continues to impact weather patterns, Hong Kong must find ways to cope with increasingly extreme conditions. The challenge lies in minimizing adverse effects on the economy while ensuring the safety of residents. How much working time per year are we willing to lose? Two weeks? Three? A month?
In addition to addressing practical concerns, there is a need to reconsider the way people are treated differently during extreme weather events. Hong Kong is gradually eliminating the difference between white-collar and blue-collar work in terms of eligibility for public holidays. This is a positive step towards social equality. It would be counterproductive to pursue the opposite policy regarding reporting for duty during inclement weather.
Legal considerations also come into play. Employees may have the right, by statute or contract, to decline to work in certain circumstances. Additionally, third-party insurance issues must be addressed. However, in practice, most people will look to the example set by the government. Since a significant portion of the workforce must continue to operate regardless of weather conditions, Hong Kong must examine those who have traditionally been exempted from working through extreme weather events.
In conclusion, the current approach to managing weather-related disruptions in Hong Kong needs reevaluation. By adopting a more pragmatic and equitable approach, the city can better navigate the challenges posed by climate change while maintaining the resilience and efficiency that define its urban landscape.